China Wildlife Trade Ban Should be Permanent


The outbreak of a novel coronavirus has been linked to a market in Wuhan, China, where wild animals and fresh meat are sold. Subsequently, on January 26th, the Chinese Government issued a notification placing a temporary ban on trade in wildlife.

This has been followed by calls from many within China to permanently ban wildlife trade, including in state media and from Chinese NGOs. An article signed by 19 Chinese academics, circulated on WeChat, calls for an end to use of protected wildlife, and international NGOs such as Freeland and WCS have appealed for the ban to be made permanent.

The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) supports those within China and elsewhere calling for the trade ban to be made permanent, and we urge policymakers to explicitly extend the scope of the ban to cover all parts and products of wildlife threatened by trade, such as big cats, elephants, rhinos and pangolins – and including captive-bred specimens.

Such a move would simultaneously address concerns over the public health impacts of wildlife trade and would set China apart as a conservation leader as it prepares to host the 15th Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity later this year.

Much consumption of wildlife in China relates to the concept of “ye wei”, which translates literally as “wild taste” and conveys a sense of adventure, daring and curiosity as well as privilege.

Wildlife products for sale in a Chinese market. Image © EIAimage.

Recent conversations with a Laos-based Chinese trader who has smuggled snakes, lizards and turtles to China suggest that the market for exotic meats is huge. “Ye wei” used to be more associated with provinces along China’s southern border but today, with improved transport networks and growing affluence, consumer demand for exotic meat in the inner provinces is also prevalent.

Our wildlife team has translated the Government announcement (see below), which is clearly aimed at restricting sales of wildlife for food consumption purposes. It is unclear whether this temporary ban also extends to other wildlife products.

Our work has primarily focused on trade in decorative items and handicrafts (such as ivory carvings and tiger skin rugs) as well as traditional medicines and tonics (such as tiger and leopard bone wine and processed pills containing tiger bone, leopard bone or pangolin scales), although trade for consumption as food is a significant concern for pangolins and big cats.

The current situation – awful as it is – has shone a spotlight on all wildlife trade in China, presenting the government with an opportunity to finally tackle demand for wildlife threatened by trade, including by closing legal markets.

It is essential that a ban on trade in threatened wildlife such as tigers, pangolins and rhinos explicitly prohibits trade in body parts of captive-bred animals. The effects of more than two decades of tiger farming in China demonstrate that trade in parts of captive-bred animals has not relieved pressure on wild populations. Instead it has perpetuated and stimulated demand – particularly given a consistent consumer preference for wild-sourced medicinal ingredients – while complicating law enforcement, providing opportunities for laundering of illegally sourced wildlife and undermining efforts to reduce demand.

It is particularly important to note that the majority of people in China have nothing to do with consumption of wildlife and, as demonstrated by recent events, many within the country want to see and end to the trade. Similarly, when a ban on trade in tiger bone and rhino horn was lifted in 2018, some 95 percent of comments from Chinese users on social media were against the move, with many calling for a total ban.

‘Wild taste’ restaurant menu, Laos. Image © EIAimage/ENV

Nor is consumption of wild meat confined to China. We have seen menus at restaurants in Laos openly advertising exotic meat, including sauteed tiger meat, bear paws, pangolin, snakes and monitor lizards and our investigators were offered what was claimed to be raw tiger meat in one of the restaurants.

Wildlife is consumed in other parts of the world too. In some instances it is at a subsistence level (where there are few protein alternatives) and in others it is commercially sold at bushmeat markets.

We extend our support to those affected by the current situation in China and elsewhere and the efforts of authorities to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Nonetheless, we believe that the current terrible situation represents an opportunity for the Chinese Government and other governments worldwide to finally implement a permanent ban on trade in wildlife threatened by trade, including captive-sourced specimens.

By explicitly extending the prohibition to cover decorative items and medicinal products, governments would be making great strides forward in public health, biodiversity conservation and in tackling the demand that drives transnational wildlife crime.

We believe that this shift needs to be backed by genuine political will to end trade in threatened wildlife species, enshrined in legislative changes and complemented by evidence-based behavior change campaigns, destruction of existing stocks of wildlife products such as tiger carcasses held in breeding facilities and the phase-out of commercial breeding of threatened wildlife such as tigers.

Text of temporary ban (EIA translation)

State Administration for Market Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and National Forestry and Grasslands Administration

Notification regarding prohibition of trade in wildlife

No. 4, 2020

In order to strictly guard against the epidemic in the new-type coronavirus and obstruct possible sources and routes of transmission, the State Administration for Market Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs and the National Forestry Grasslands Administration have decided to prohibit trade in wildlife, from the date this notification is issued until the epidemic situation is resolved nationwide.

  1. All wildlife rearing and breeding facilities shall implement quarantine and shall strictly prohibit external movement, transport or sale;
  2. All business operations including agricultural product markets, supermarkets, food and beverage sellers and online sales platforms shall strictly prohibit trade of wildlife in any form;
  3. Any member of society who discovers wildlife trade activities in contravention of laws and regulations can report via the 12315 hotline or platform;
  4. All relevant departments shall strengthen inspection; where any violations of this notification are discovered, they shall investigate in earnest, in accordance with laws and regulations, and shall require traders and trade locations to cease trading, rectify and close down respectively. Where a crime is suspected, this shall be transferred to the public security bureau;
  5. Consumers shall fully recognize the health risks of consuming wildlife as food, shall distance themselves from “wild meat”, and shall instead eat and drink healthily.

Featured image: various meats, including those from wild animals, sold in a Chinese market. Image © EIAimage.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About Author

We investigate and campaign against environmental crime and abuse. Our undercover investigations expose transnational wildlife crime, with a focus on elephants, pangolins and tigers and forest crimes such as illegal logging and deforestation for cash crops such as palm oil. We work to safeguard global marine ecosystems by addressing the threats posed by plastic pollution, bycatch and commercial exploitation of whales, dolphins and porpoises. Finally, we reduce the impact of climate change by campaigning to eliminate powerful refrigerant greenhouse gases, exposing related illicit trade and improving energy efficiency in the cooling sector. We use our findings in hard-hitting reports to campaign for new legislation, improved governance and more effective enforcement. Click to see author's profile.

Leave A Reply